Immediately we can toss “word” in with “deed” because saying things is an action and can thus be considered a deed. That makes for a very short paragraph on the topic eh? “Word” is out… That leaves us with “thought” and “deed” which I shall refer to as “intent” and “action” ok? Word! >.>
I was thinking about “intent” versus “action” today because they are different beasts and here are some things that I came up with:
1. Good intent may lead to good or bad actions.
2. Bad intent almost always leads to bad actions.
3. When a bad action occurs I tend to judge the event based on the intent.
4. When a good action occurs people tend to not think about the intent.
I think my obsession with “intent” and “action” as they equate to results is based on the fact that 99% of my intentions are good. And of those 99% good intentions the results are mostly not the desired one. “The path to hell is paved with good intent” or so they say, but I refuse to believe that “intent” is that worthless unless one does not act on it. Who can truly say with 100% accuracy what the given consequences of any action are? And must we be so results driven that we fail to see the value of a golden heart? For the record, I am not throwing a pity party here or questioning someone’s judgment of me. It is pure pondering. But…to get back on track it takes many failures before a stroke of genius yields something spectacular, so why not appreciate good intent with risk in the hope that some miracle occurs as opposed to “play-it-safe” actions? Just a thought. ;-)
No comments:
Post a Comment